i love fat

what do i love about women. Nice tits. Nice ass. Sexy round belly. Sexy hips. So hot. Turns me on so much.Mmmmm. I love the placement of fat. That makes me hot. How their fat is placed on their body. Its not just the fat. It has to be placed nicely. A pile of fat is not nice. Sexy fat lips is hot. It makes me marry them and loose lots of money. The fat. Where the fat is on their body and how it is shaped. That fat is place so hotly I want it. I will put up with the peice of shit that is under the piles of fat. Yummy, you are so sexy I will throw away my life on your nice shaped and placed fat. Men are not hot. They don't place their fat in the right way. Women know how to place their fat to make me do stuipid things. I want that sexy display of fat. Shake your fat titles in my face so I loose my mind. That fat is sooooooo hot. I want you, you spawn of satan worshipping hotness with just the right fat.

Taxes paid by the Rich

I was watching a video that is was unfair that rich people pay more money in taxes than poor people. So I googled that and found http://www.itep.org/whopays which says rich people pay a smaller percentage of the overall income in taxes. The first video must be about the actual amount of money paid rather than the percentage. The quote was the poorest people pay 10.9 percent of their income and the richest pay 5.4 percent of their income. Then you have the other dynamic that the rich earn more of the income year after year. That means that for every dollar extra the rich each the goverment gets an extra 5.4 cents and for every dollar less that the poor people earn the government looses 10.9 cents. As income transfers from poor people to rich people the amount of money the goverment collect must be decreasing in terms of share of the ecomony. That bring up the question does the tax system existing to extract money from each person or to extract money from the flow of income. If it exists to extra money from each person then the complain of rich people that they pay more actual dollars is valid but if it exists to extract money from the flow of income then the complaint is not valid.

If one was designing a goverment and need to obtain money to run the goverment, how would you obtain that money. Each year, the people in the country produce products and services. The goverment wants to take a portion of that yearly to run. It would make sense to take a portion of the overall production rather than a fixed portion from each person. That way if the goverment took 10 percent of the overall that would be 10 percent of the products and services of the country. If the goverment took a fair portion from each person depending on how the income was divided the amount of money obtained would vary depending on the division of the income.

Let's imaging a fair system. Say the country has two people in it, Richie and Poorie. They both earn 100 dollars a year. The government taxes them each 10 dollars. That is 10 percent of their income. That is fair. Next year, Richie is smart and works hard and Poorie and lazy and does not work very hard. Richie earns 190 dollars and Poorie earns 10 dollars. In the fair system Poorie would pay 10 dollar and Richie would pay 10 dollars. All of Poorie's income would go to the government and very little of Richie's income would. Moral or not that is not practical. What is even more interesting is that in the real word income discrepency is way larger so a fair system would never work unless you let the goverment run out of money. Maybe that is why the deficits are always occurring. Where is the goverment getting the money to borrow. From Richie. That's funny.

You say Erectile Disfunction; I say erectile function

So there is this thing now about erectile disfunction now. Some men are not able to give the dog a bone. The men are erectile disfunctional. Lets think about erections. They are part of sexual reproduction. This is a very old process in organisms and pre-dates human. Men that try to reproduce with infertile females reduce there chances of having offspring in the next generation. Evolutionarily successful men would prefer to f the hotties and not the notties. Image men that are turned on by grannies. They might get to bone a lot but they won't be having any offspring off the grannies. Evolutionarily successful people will have genes for preferring women that manifest characteristics of fertile females.

That brings us to erectile disfunction. Older men trying to bone older women who are not fertile. It makes sense that they would not be raising the bone for women that display characteristics of being unfertile. That is not erectile disfunction. That is erectile function.